Clinical heterogeneity in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: Single tertiary center experience
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 18 ISSUE: 1
P: 75 - 81
March 2026

Clinical heterogeneity in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: Single tertiary center experience

J Turk Soc Rheumatol 2026;18(1):75-81
1. University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ankara, Türkiye
2. Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ankara, Türkiye
3. University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Ankara, Türkiye
4. Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 02.11.2025
Accepted Date: 18.01.2026
Online Date: 27.03.2026
Publish Date: 27.03.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the clinical spectrum, pattern of organ involvement, treatment strategies, and disease severity in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) at a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients <18 years with cSLE diagnosed by Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics criteria and followed between August 2019 and September 2025. Disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), and lupus nephritis was classified according to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society criteria.

Results

The age at diagnosis was 13 years [interquartile range (IQR): 11-15]. Mucocutaneous manifestations predominated, with a cutaneous rash present in 29 patients (54.7%). Other common features included non-erosive arthritis (43.4%, n=23), oral ulcers (13.2%, n=7), and alopecia (11.3%, n=6). Renal involvement occurred in 31 patients (58.5%). Renal biopsies were conducted in 25 patients (47.1% of the study population), all of whom had histopathological confirmation of lupus nephritis. The distribution among biopsied patients was as follows: Class II: 11 (20.7%); Class IV: 11 (20.7%); Class I: 2 (3.7%); and Class V: 1 (1.8%). All patients received hydroxychloroquine. Systemic corticosteroids were administered to 50 patients (94.3%). Mycophenolate mofetil was the primary immunosuppressive treatment in 43.4% (n=23) of patients, whereas cyclophosphamide was the primary immunosuppressive treatment in 41.5% (n=22) of patients. Disease activity was high at baseline (median SLEDAI-2K score: 16, IQR: 8-20), but showed a significant improvement by the final assessment (median SLEDAI-2K score: 1.5, IQR: 0-4; p<0.001).

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the heterogeneous presentation of cSLE, with frequent mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal involvement and notable renal and neurological manifestations. Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy are essential for favorable outcomes.

Keywords:
Childhood, disease severity, lupus erythematosus, organ involvement

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical presentations and broad organ involvement. Its pathogenesis involves the deposition of immune complexes and autoantibody-mediated tissue damage. Although it most commonly affects the skin and musculoskeletal system, SLE may involve any organ, including the kidneys, the central nervous system, the heart, and the lungs.[1] Approximately 15% to 20% of all SLE cases are diagnosed in pediatric patients (under 18 years of age), a subgroup formally termed childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Although the disease usually appears after the first decade of life, it can rarely begin before age 5; findings in this early period require consideration of monogenic forms of SLE.[2, 3]

Comparative analyses of adult-onset SLE and cSLE have revealed that different clinical profiles may exist. cSLE is characterized by a significantly higher prevalence of constitutional and mucocutaneous manifestations—including fever, lymphadenopathy, and malar rash—as well as hematological abnormalities, such as cytopenias.[4-6] Furthermore, renal involvement, particularly lupus nephritis, is reported more frequently in cSLE; however, the distribution of histopathological subtypes appears similar to that observed in adults.[7, 8] Neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE (NPSLE) have been reported more commonly in cSLE, although their exact prevalence remains uncertain.[6, 9]

The diagnosis of cSLE is established using validated classification systems, including those from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC), and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/ACR 2019 criteria.[10-12] Symptoms and age at diagnosis can influence the disease phenotype, organ involvement, and serological characteristics.[13] Advances in diagnostic techniques and increased disease awareness have contributed to improved outcomes compared with earlier reports.[14] Nevertheless, cSLE tends to present with higher disease activity and severity, primarily due to the increased frequency of major organ involvement, such as lupus nephritis.[15] The management of cSLE requires a multidisciplinary approach aimed at controlling disease activity, preventing flares and irreversible organ damage, achieving remission, and minimizing treatment-related adverse effects.[16]

The aim of this study is to present the clinical features, disease activity and severity, and disease management of cSLE patients followed at a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective longitudinal study was conducted at our institution between August 2019 and September 2025 in patients aged <18 years who met SLICC criteria and were followed with a diagnosis of cSLE. Patients with missing data or a follow-up period shorter than 6 months were excluded from the study.

Data were systematically collected on demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and organ system involvement. Recorded laboratory data included hematological parameters (hemoglobin levels, leukocyte counts, and platelet counts) and inflammatory indicators, specifically C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The immunological assessment focused on the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti–double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA). Additionally, pathological data, particularly renal biopsy results for patients with lupus nephritis, were documented. Disease activity was quantified at diagnosis and at the most recent clinical evaluation using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K).[17, 18] The histopathological classification of lupus nephritis was conducted in accordance with the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) recommendations.[19]

Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity was defined as the persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin [immunoglobulin G (IgG)/immunoglobulin M (IgM)], and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I (IgG/IgM) antibodies on at least two occasions, measured ≥12 weeks apart. Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was defined according to the revised 2006 Sapporo criteria, which require at least one clinical event (documented arterial, venous, or small-vessel thrombosis) and at least one persistently positive aPL test on two occasions at least 12 weeks apart.[20]

For the assessment of SLE disease activity, remission was categorized as off-treatment or on-treatment. Off-treatment remission was defined as an SLEDAI-2K score of 0 in the absence of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapy, whereas on-treatment remission was defined as an SLEDAI-2K score of 0 with prednisolone ≤5 mg/day and maintenance-dose immunosuppressive therapy. Low disease activity state was defined as an SLEDAI-2K score <4 with prednisolone <7.5 mg/day and maintenance-dose immunosuppressive therapy, whereas high disease activity state was defined as an SLEDAI-2K score >4 with prednisolone >7.5 mg/day and induction-dose immunosuppressive therapy.[21]

At our center, renal biopsy is performed in pediatric SLE patients in the presence of significant proteinuria (including nephrotic-range proteinuria) persistent hematuria, reduced renal function, or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Biopsy is also considered in cases of persistent active lupus nephritis despite therapy or when clinical findings suggest subclinical renal involvement.

The study was approved by University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital’s Ethical Committee (approval number: TABED1-25-1785, date: 22.10.2025) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were reported as counts (n) for categorical data and as means, medians, and standard deviations for continuous variables. The Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to assess the normality of data distribution. For group comparisons, independent Student’s t-tests were used for normally distributed variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for non-normally distributed variables. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

A total of 53 patients diagnosed with cSLE according to the SLICC classification criteria were enrolled in this study. The cohort was predominantly female (n=48, 90.6%), corresponding to a female-to-male ratio of approximately 9:1. The median age at cSLE diagnosis was 13 years (range: 11-15 years), and the median follow-up duration was 26 months (range: 12-48 months) (Table 1).

Mucocutaneous involvement was a common feature, with an acute or subacute cutaneous lupus rash observed in 29 patients (54.7%). Other frequent manifestations included non-erosive arthritis (n=23, 43.4%), oral ulcers (n=7, 13.2%), and alopecia (n=6, 11.3%). All clinical findings and their frequencies are given in Table 1.

Serological profiling revealed a high prevalence of autoantibodies. ANA was detected in 51 (96.2%) of patients, and anti-dsDNA was positive in 43 (81.1%) of patients. Hypocomplementemia, defined by low C3 and/or C4 levels, was observed in 39 (73.6%) of the study population. Antiphospholipid antibodies were present in 11 patients (21.6%), and 8 patients (15.1%) met the criteria for aPL syndrome. Raynaud’s phenomenon was noted in two patients (3.7%). A summary of immunological characteristics is presented in Table 1.

Hematological abnormalities were common, with anemia detected in 18 patients (33.9%), lymphopenia in 16 (30.1%), and thrombocytopenia in 5 (9.4%). Pancytopenia was documented in four patients (7.5%).

Renal involvement developed in 31 patients (58.5%) during the follow-up period. A renal biopsy was performed in 25 patients (47.1% of the total cohort); all biopsies confirmed lupus nephritis. Histopathological classification, according to the ISN/RPS 2003 criteria, revealed the following distribution among biopsied cases: Class II in 11 cases (20.7%), Class IV in 11 cases (20.7%), Class I in 2 cases (3.7%), and Class V in 1 case (1.8%).

Neurological involvement was observed in 19 patients (33.9%), with mood changes being the most common manifestation (n=10, 18.2%), followed by seizures (n=3, 5.6%), psychosis (n=2, 3.7%), neuropathy (n=2, 3.7%), mononeuritis multiplex (n=1, 1.8%), and myelitis (n=1, 1.8%).

The cohort exhibited high disease activity at baseline, with a median SLEDAI-2K score of 16 (IQR: 8-20). At the final assessment, a significant reduction was observed, with the median SLEDAI-2K score decreasing to 1.5 (IQR 0-4; p<0.001), as detailed in Table 1.

Hydroxychloroquine was universally administered (n=53, 100%). Systemic corticosteroids were used in 50 patients (94.3%). Regarding immunosuppressive agents, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was the most frequently prescribed (n=23, 43.4%), followed by cyclophosphamide (n=22, 41.5%). In a subset of eight patients with renal involvement, rituximab was administered following cyclophosphamide treatment. Plasmapheresis was performed in the management of 4 patients (7.5%) (Table 1).

Comorbid conditions, distinct from manifestations attributable to cSLE, were present in 30 patients (56.6%) at the time of diagnosis. The spectrum of documented comorbidities included epilepsy (n=4), delayed puberty or amenorrhea (n=4), hepatitis or cholestasis (n=3), Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (n=2), type 1 diabetes mellitus (n=1), and Klippel-Feil syndrome (n=1) (Table 2).

Discussion

This study delineates the clinical, serological, and histopathological profiles of cSLE within a single tertiary pediatric rheumatology referral center. While mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal symptoms were the most prevalent clinical manifestations, renal and neurological complications were the primary organ systems involved. Within the lupus nephritis subgroup, class II and IV emerged as the predominant histopathological patterns. Furthermore, the substantial decline in initially high SLEDAI-2K scores throughout the follow-up period reflects the efficacy of the administered immunosuppressive regimens in achieving disease stabilization.

cSLE is a multisystem inflammatory disorder marked by pronounced heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. The disease spans a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from relatively mild manifestations to severe, life-threatening organ involvement. Many initial symptoms, including oral ulcers, fever, arthralgia, headache, and weight loss, are non-specific and commonly overlap with other childhood illnesses, complicating early diagnosis. Notably, the incidence of major organ involvement—such as arthritis, nephritis, and neuropsychiatric manifestations—is inversely related to age at disease onset.[22, 23] A Turkish cohort study demonstrated that patients with cSLE exhibit an increased prevalence of involvement of the renal, mucocutaneous, hematologic, and neuropsychiatric organ systems, coupled with elevated seropositivity rates for anti-dsDNA and anticardiolipin antibodies.[24] These observations are supported by parallel findings from a Canadian cohort, which reported significantly elevated frequencies of neuropsychiatric and anticardiolipin antibody positivity in patients with cSLE.[25] Furthermore, cross-national epidemiological studies conducted in France and China consistently report that pediatric-onset disease is associated with higher rates of renal and hematologic involvement, as well as overall greater disease severity compared with adult-onset SLE. Collectively, these distinctions not only highlight the critical need for early recognition and intervention in cSLE, but also point to fundamental challenges in applying classification criteria developed primarily for adult populations to pediatric cases.[26, 27]

Renal involvement is the most prevalent and serious organ manifestation in cSLE, occurring more frequently than in adult-onset disease. Epidemiological studies report prevalence estimates for lupus nephritis in cSLE ranging from 30% to 75%.[28] A definitive diagnosis requires histopathological confirmation via renal biopsy, a procedure recommended when renal disease is clinically suspected in SLE patients.[29] While immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis is the most common lesion, the histopathological spectrum also includes tubulointerstitial nephritis, lupus podocytopathy, and various forms of renal vascular injury.[30] Akgun et al.[31] found the incidence of lupus nephritis to be 43.2%. Class IV lupus nephritis, the most common subtype, was the most frequently observed class in our study. In one study, renal involvement was observed in 115 (53.2%) of 216 patients in a cSLE cohort. Lupus nephritis developed in 85 of these patients. Among those who developed nephritis, class IV was the most common.[24] Renal involvement was detected in 31 patients (58.5%) of our cohort. Of these patients, eleven had class II and the remainder had class IV lupus nephritis.

Neuropsychiatric involvement is more frequent and is associated with substantial morbidity in cSLE. The clinical spectrum is highly diverse, encompassing manifestations ranging from headaches and cognitive dysfunction to psychosis and cerebrovascular events. These neuropsychiatric features can serve as the initial presentation of the disease and are often correlated with poorer long-term outcomes. The diagnosis and management of NPSLE remain particularly challenging in the pediatric population.[22] Artim-Esen et al.[24] reported a higher prevalence of neuropsychiatric involvement in the cSLE group (12.1%) and less associated damage than in the adult-onset SLE group. Neuropsychiatric involvement was observed in 19 (35.8%) of the 53 patients in the cohort. The most common diagnosis in this group was mood swings, observed in 10 patients.

Hematologic abnormalities are a common feature of cSLE, with autoimmune cytopenias representing a frequent finding. The spectrum of involvement includes leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. In clinical practice, during the diagnostic evaluation, it is essential to exclude other potential causes of cytopenias, such as nutritional deficiencies, concurrent infections, or medication effects.[22] In two studies published in Türkiye, Artim-Esen et al.[24] reported that the most common hematological abnormality in their cohort was lymphopenia (59.7%), followed by anemia (33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (29.6%). In contrast, Akgun et al.[31], similar to our study, reported that the most common abnormalities were anemia (51.6%), lymphopenia (37.8%), and thrombocytopenia (21.6%), respectively. All patients in the cohort had hematologic involvement. Anemia was the most common (n=18, 33.9%), followed by lymphopenia (n=16, 30.1%) and thrombocytopenia (n=15, 28.3%). Pancytopenia was observed in 4 patients (14.3%).

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is associated with hypercoagulability, predisposing patients to thrombosis and thromboembolism. Additionally, systemic manifestations, such as lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, may be observed; in severe cases, macrophage activation syndrome, a life-threatening complication can develop.[32] In a previous study of patients tested for antiphospholipid antibodies, positivity for aCL (IgM and/or IgG) was observed in 12% of patients. However, only three of these seropositive patients (3.3% of the total cohort) met the diagnostic criteria for aPL syndrome.[5] While aPL positivity was observed in 11 patients in the cohort, APS was detected in 8 of these patients.

Mucocutaneous involvement is a common clinical feature of cSLE. Cardinal manifestations include photosensitive malar rash, discoid lesions, non-scarring alopecia, and painless oral or nasal ulcers. The recognition of these cutaneous signs is diagnostically crucial, as identifying lupus-specific rashes can facilitate earlier diagnosis and help prevent delays in disease management.[22] In a cohort of 512 patients with cSLE, Zhang et al.[33] identified cutaneous lupus as the most common mucocutaneous manifestation (29.3%), followed by oral ulcers (23.1%) and non-scarring alopecia (19.5%). Cutaneous involvement was observed in 29 patients (54.7%). Oral ulcers were observed in 7 (13.2%) patients, and regional alopecia in 6 (11.3%).

The management of cSLE poses considerable challenges, largely attributable to the marked clinical heterogeneity among patients. Although treatment guidelines from various rheumatology societies are primarily derived from adult studies, they are routinely applied to pediatric cases, including guidelines for lupus nephritis.[34-36] A cornerstone of these recommendations is the universal administration of hydroxychloroquine, unless contraindications exist.[37] Treatment intensity is typically escalated based on organ involvement through the use of corticosteroids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and other immunosuppressive agents. This finding aligns with a UK cohort study that identified MMF as the predominant immunosuppressive agent.[38] A recent study reported that all but one patient used hydroxychloroquine, and the most commonly used DMARD was MMF, accounting for 51.3% of cases.[31] In our study, MMF was the most frequently used DMARD, accounting for 43.3% of cases. For lupus nephritis, specific induction therapy for proliferative disease involves cyclophosphamide or MMF in combination with corticosteroids. Recent guideline updates indicate that belimumab or calcineurin inhibitors added to standard of care may also be considered first-line options, though patient selection criteria remain undefined.[36] Consequently, in the absence of definitive treatment algorithms, institutional experience and center-specific protocols play a decisive role in therapeutic decision-making.

Adherence to established treatment guidelines and the implementation of early, aggressive therapeutic strategies are associated with significant improvements in disease activity metrics. This is evidenced by longitudinal studies; for instance, one Turkish cohort reported a decline in SLEDAI-2K scores from a mean of 22.5±8.1 at diagnosis to a final median of 0. Similarly, a 2021 multinational study of 670 cSLE patients documented a reduction in the mean SLEDAI-2K score from 16.5±8.9 at baseline to 4.6±5.8 at the final assessment.[39, 40] The SLEDAI-2K score for patients in the cohort was 16 (8-20) at diagnosis and 1.5 (0-4) at last follow-up.

Study Limitations

Certain limitations of the current study warrant consideration. Primarily, its retrospective nature and the relatively modest sample size may limit the generalizability of the conclusions. As this was a single-center investigation focused on a rare pediatric condition, the distribution of lupus nephritis classes may not fully align with the broader literature, which could affect the generalizability of our results. Conversely, a major strength of this research is the comprehensive documentation of disease activity trajectories and long-term patient outcomes, which are critical for managing a high-morbidity disease such as cSLE.

Conclusion

This study highlights the heterogeneous clinical spectrum of cSLE, characterized by frequent mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal involvement and by significant renal and neurological involvement. Despite high initial disease activity, favorable outcomes were achieved through timely diagnosis and appropriate immunosuppressive therapy. These findings underscore the importance of early diagnosis, close follow-up, and multidisciplinary management in optimizing long-term outcomes in cSLE.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital’s Ethical Committee (approval number: TABED1-25-1785, date: 22.10.2025) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: Ş.E., U.S.B., B.Ç.A., Concept: Ş.E., U.S.B., B.Ç.A., Design: Ş.E., U.S.B., B.Ç.A., Data Collection and Processing: Ş.E., E.Ö., Ş.E.T., D.Ö., M.I.E., Y.U.E., S.N.Y., N.Ç.P., E.E., Analysis or Interpretation: Ş.E., Z.E.T., Literature Search: Ş.E., N.Ç.P., U.S.B., B.Ç.A., Writing: Ş.E.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial disclosures.

References

1
Tucker LB, Menon S, Schaller JG, Isenberg DA. Adult- and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of onset, clinical features, serology, and outcome. Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34:866-72.
2
Rodrigues Fonseca A, Felix Rodrigues MC, Sztajnbok FR, Gerardin Poirot Land M, Knupp Feitosa de Oliveira S. Comparison among ACR1997, SLICC and the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Adv Rheumatol. 2019;59:20.
3
Batu ED. Monogenic systemic lupus erythematosus: insights in pathophysiology. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38:1763-75.
4
Tirosh I, Spielman S, Barel O, et al. Whole exome sequencing in childhood-onset lupus frequently detects single gene etiologies. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019;17:52.
5
Sahin S, Adrovic A, Barut K, et al. Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus in Turkey: demographic, clinical and laboratory features with disease activity and outcome. Lupus. 2018;27:514-9.
6
Livingston B, Bonner A, Pope J. Differences in clinical manifestations between childhood-onset lupus and adult-onset lupus: a meta-analysis. Lupus. 2011;20:1345-55.
7
Tarr T, Dérfalvi B, Győri N, et al. Similarities and differences between pediatric and adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015;24:796-803.
8
Tucker LB, Uribe AG, Fernández M, et al. Adolescent onset of lupus results in more aggressive disease and worse outcomes: results of a nested matched case-control study within LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA LVII). Lupus. 2008;17:314-22.
9
Mina R, Brunner HI. Pediatric lupus--are there differences in presentation, genetics, response to therapy, and damage accrual compared with adult lupus? Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2010;36:53-80, vii-viii.
10
Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725.
11
Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, et al. Derivation and validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2677-86.
12
Mosca M, Costenbader KH, Johnson SR, et al. Brief report: how do patients with newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus present? A multicenter cohort of early systemic lupus erythematosus to inform the development of new classification criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:91-8.
13
Ruiz-Irastorza G, Khamashta MA, Castellino G, Hughes GR. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2001;357:1027-32.
14
Lehman TJ, McCurdy DK, Bernstein BH, King KK, Hanson V. Systemic lupus erythematosus in the first decade of life. Pediatrics. 1989;83:235-9.
15
Descloux E, Durieu I, Cochat P, et al. Influence of age at disease onset in the outcome of paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:779-84.
16
Hollander MC, Sage JM, Greenler AJ, et al. International consensus for provisions of quality-driven care in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65:1416-23.
17
Silva CA, Aikawa NE, Bonfa E. Updates in the care and management of children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2024;36(5):315-21.
18
Lai NS, Lu MC, Chang HH, et al. A comparison of the correlation of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity score (SLE-DAS) with health-related quality of life. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2137.
19
Groot N, de Graeff N, Marks SD, et al. European evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of childhood-onset lupus nephritis: the SHARE initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1965-73.
20
Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:295-306.
21
Ugarte-Gil MF, Gamboa-Cárdenas RV, Reátegui-Sokolova C, et al. Better health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus predicted by low disease activity state/remission: data from the peruvian almenara lupus cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72:1159-62.
22
Smith EMD, Lythgoe H, Midgley A, Beresford MW, Hedrich CM. Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: update on clinical presentation, pathophysiology and treatment options. Clin Immunol. 2019;209:108274.
23
Benseler SM, Silverman ED. Neuropsychiatric involvement in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2007;16:564-71.
24
Artim-Esen B, Şahin S, Çene E, et al. Comparison of disease characteristics, organ damage, and survival in patients with juvenile-onset and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a combined cohort from 2 tertiary centers in Turkey. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:619-25.
25
Kim H, Levy DM, Silverman ED, et al. A comparison between childhood and adult onset systemic lupus erythematosus adjusted for ethnicity from the 1000 Canadian faces of lupus cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019:kez006.
26
Kachaner A, Mageau A, Timsit JF, Rio J, Papo T, Sacré K. SLE patients with childhood-onset: a nation-wide population-based study. Autoimmun Rev. 2025;24:103802.
27
Gao S, Yu Z, Ma X, et al. Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in China, 2016-21: a nationwide study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024;8:762-72.
28
Sousa S, Gonçalves MJ, Inês LS, et al. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus: comparative data of childhood, adult and late-onset disease in a national register. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36:955-60.
29
Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, et al; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:797-808.
30
Avar-Aydın PÖ, Brunner HI. Revisiting childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59:336-44.
31
Akgun O KKG, Demirkan FG, Arik SD, Aktay Ayaz N. Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center experience. Compreh Med. 2024;16:267-74.
32
Akca UK, Ayaz NA. Comorbidities of antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus in children. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020;22:21.
33
Zhang Y, Shen T, Gao S, et al. Validation and optimization of classification criteria for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a multi-center Chinese cohort. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1611349.
34
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, et al. 2019 update of the joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:713-23.
35
Groot N, de Graeff N, Avcin T, et al. European evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: the SHARE initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1788-96.
36
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Lupus Nephritis Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of LUPUS NEPHRITIS. Kidney Int. 2024;105:S1-S69.
37
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, et al. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:736-45.
38
Smith EMD, Egbivwie N, Jorgensen AL, et al. Real world treatment of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: data from the UK JSLE cohort study. Clin Immunol. 2022;239:109028.
39
Balci S, Ekinci RMK, Bayazit AK, et al. Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center experience from southern Turkey. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38:1459-68.
40
Pitta AC, Silva CA, Insfrán CE, et al; Brazilian Childhood-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Group. The new 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria specific domains at diagnosis can predict damage accrual in 670 childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2021;30:2286-91.