New evidence and future in the adventure of spondyloarthritis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Invited Review
P: 4-12
December 2020

New evidence and future in the adventure of spondyloarthritis

1. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Romatoloji Bilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Publish Date: 11.12.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

In recent years, treatment options for both axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) have expanded significantly due to improvements in immunopathological information, thus allowing the use of targeted therapies. The development and validation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in spondyloarthritis (SpA) over the past two decades has revolutionized SpA management where previously effective treatment was inadequate. In recent years, TNFi biosimilars have been accepted for infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept, and have been shown to be effective and safe, and have begun to reduce costs for this class of drugs. Some new drugs for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are being developed clinically. Anti-interleukin (IL)-17RA antibody brodalumab has phase 3 data, but the clinical program has been discontinued due to suicidal ideation in individuals. Studies on anti-IL17A/F antibody bimekizumab, antibodies against the subunit p19 of IL-23, guselkumab, tildrakizumab and risankizumab and several Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are ongoing. Targeting IL-23 with anti-P40 or anti-P19 in axSpA did not show any significant improvement, and the development of these biological drugs was interrupted by this indication. Apremilast could not reach the primary end point in phase 3 study. Risankizumab did not show efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Some other drugs, including Bimekizumab, are in the process of working in AS, and efficacy data are not currently available. A phase 3 study of tofacitinib in AS is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03502616). A phase 2 study of filgotinib, a highly selective JAK 1 inhibitor, has recently been reported to have reached the primary endpoint in patients with active AS. Upadacitinib, another selective JAK 1 inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in the study results in PsA and AS. The optimal dose and selectivity of JAK inhibition in SpA has not yet been established. Determining the important role of microbiome in AS is also an active area of research and treatments targeting the microbiome located in AS patients may be in the future. Studies are ongoing to develop small molecule inhibitors of the endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases to try in axSpA, with the strong genetic combination of Aminopeptidase genes ERAP1 and ERAP2 with AS. While effective biological therapies for non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) are limited to TNFi, secukinumab and ixekizumab were found to be effective and safe in nr-axSpA in phase 3 studies very recently. There are currently no registered JAK inhibitor studies for the treatment of nr-axSpA, but it is likely that there will be nr-axSpA trials if phase 3 studies in AS are successful. Finally, in parallel with the increase in pathophysiological information, future new treatment targets in SpA allow us to comment on targeting the intestinal-SpA interaction, including microbiota and integrins, on cellular actors such as innate lymphoid cells, mucosal associated invariant T cells, innate NK T cells. It is exciting for the doctor and patients to increase the treatment goals and thus expand the SpA treatment spectrum. At the same time, this diversity requires a more personalized treatment strategy with the differences to be considered in the choice of treatment.

References

1Dougados M, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis. Lancet 2011;377:2127-37.
2Dougados M, Dijkmans B, Khan M, Maksymowych W, van der Linden S, Brandt J. Conventional treatments for ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61(Suppl 3):iii40-50.
3Boulos P, Dougados M, Macleod SM, Hunsche E. Pharmacological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review. Drugs 2005;65:2111-27.
4Chen J, Liu C. Is sulfasalazine effective in ankylosing spondylitis? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol 2006;33:722-31.
5Sieper J, Braun J. New treatment options in ankylosing spondylitis: a role for anti-TNFα therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60(Suppl 3):iii58-61.
6van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewe R, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:978-91.
7van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, Braun J, van der Heijde D. First update of the current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis with non-pharmacological treatment and non-biologic drugs: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1388-96.
8Regnaux JP, Davergne T, Palazzo C, et al. Exercise programmes for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10:CD011321.
9van Mens LJJ, van de Sande MGH, Baeten DLP. New treatment paradigms in spondyloarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30:79-86.
10Wendling D. New targeted therapies in spondyloarthritis: what are the limits? Immunotherapy 2019;11:557-60.
11Asquith M, Elewaut D, Lin P, Rosenbaum JT. The role of the gut and microbes in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2014;28:687-702.
12Venken K, Elewaut D. New immune cells in spondyloarthritis: Key players or innocent bystanders? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015;29:706-14.
13Jacques P, McGonagle D. The role of mechanical stress in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis and how to combat it. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2014;28:703-10.
14Gill T, Asquith M, Rosenbaum JT, Colbert RA. The intestinal microbiome in spondyloarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2015;27:319-25.
15Lories RJ, Luyten FP, de Vlam K. Progress in spondylarthritis. Mechanisms of new bone formation in spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:221.
16Baum R, Gravallese EM. Impact of inflammation on the osteoblast in rheumatic diseases. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2014;12:9-16.
17Lories RJ, Schett G. Pathophysiology of new bone formation and ankylosis in spondyloarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2012;38:555-67.
18Schett G, Lories RJ, D’Agostino MA, et al. Enthesitis: from pathophysiology to treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017;13:731-41.
19Sherlock JP, Buckley CD, Cua DJ. The critical role of interleukin-23 in spondyloarthropathy. Mol Immunol 2014;57:38-43.
20Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011;31:986-1000.
21Tahir H. Therapies in ankylosing spondylitis-from clinical trials to clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57(suppl_6):vi23-vi8.
22Poddubnyy D, Sieper J. What is the best treatment target in axial spondyloarthritis: tumour necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 17, or both? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:1145-50.
23Bridgewood C, Watad A, Cuthbert RJ, McGonagle D. Spondyloarthritis: new insights into clinical aspects, translational immunology and therapeutics. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30:526-32.
24Colbert RA, Navid F, Gill T. The role of HLA-B*27 in spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2017;31:797-815.
25Chatzikyriakidou A, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Non-HLA genes in ankylosing spondylitis: what meta-analyses have shown? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014;32:735-9.
26Mease P. Emerging Immunomodulatory Therapies and New Treatment Paradigms for Axial Spondyloarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2019;21:35.
27Chingcuanco F, Segal JB, Kim SC, Alexander GC. Bioequivalence of Biosimilar Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Inhibitors Compared With Their Reference Biologics: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:565-74.
28Fragoulis GE, Siebert S, McInnes IB. Therapeutic Targeting of IL-17 and IL-23 Cytokines in Immune-Mediated Diseases. Annu Rev Med 2016;67:337-53.
29Blair HA. Secukinumab: A Review in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Drugs 2019;79:433-43.
30Preuss CV, Quick J. Ixekizumab. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) 2020.
31Hawkes JE, Yan BY, Chan TC, Krueger JG. Discovery of the IL-23/IL-17 Signaling Pathway and the Treatment of Psoriasis. J Immunol 2018;201:1605-13.
32Chiricozzi A, Antonioli L, Panduri S, Fornai M, Romanelli M, Blandizzi C. Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019;19:1-8.
33Bangert C, Kopp T. Tildrakizumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Immunotherapy 2018;10:1105-22.
34Keating GM. Apremilast: A Review in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Drugs 2017;77:459-72.
35Berekmeri A, Mahmood F, Wittmann M, Helliwell P. Tofacitinib for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2018;14:719-30.
36Dhillon S. Tofacitinib: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drugs 2017;77:1987-2001.
37Westhovens R. Clinical efficacy of new JAK inhibitors under development. Just more of the same? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(Suppl 1):i27-i33.
38Baker KF, Isaacs JD. Novel therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: What can we learn from their use in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis? Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:175-87.
39Kawalec P, Holko P, Mocko P, Pilc A. Comparative effectiveness of abatacept, apremilast, secukinumab and ustekinumab treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2018;38:189-201.
40Shirley M, Scott LJ. Secukinumab: A Review in Psoriatic Arthritis Drugs 2016;76:1135-45.
41Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, et al. Secukinumab, an Interleukin-17A Inhibitor, in Ankylosing Spondylitis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2534-48.
42Deodhar A, Blanco R, Dokoupilová E, et al. Secukinumab improves signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: primary results of a randomized controlled phase III study. Arthritis & Rheumatology 2020.
43Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Gensler LS, et al. Ixekizumab for patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-X): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet 2020;395:53-64.
44Robinson PC, Sengupta R, Siebert S. Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA): Advances in Classification, Imaging and Therapy. Rheumatol Ther 2019;6:165-77.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House