Quantification of the radiographic joint space width in knee osteoarthritis is a reproducible method
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 3-6
April 2020

Quantification of the radiographic joint space width in knee osteoarthritis is a reproducible method

J Turk Soc Rheumatol 2020;12(1):3-6
1. Kayseri Şehir Hastanesi, Romatoloji Kliniği, Kayseri, Türkiye
2. Gazi Üniversitesi Hastanesi, İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Romatoloji Bilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
3. Rush Üniversitesi, Romatoloji Bilim Dalı, Chicago, ABD
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 23.12.2019
Accepted Date: 14.02.2020
Publish Date: 06.05.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Quantification of the radiographic joint space width (JSW) of the knee is a widely used method to evaluate progression of osteoarthritis (OA) and remains the only structural outcome accepted by the USA FDA to demonstrate OA disease modification. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short and long term reproducibility of medial knee JSW measurements using Image J software (US NIH, Bethesda, MD, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) in medial knee OA.

Methods:

Thirty-seven patients with symptomatic medial knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3, pain on ambulation >30 mm on a 100-mm Visual Analog scale) were assessed. Semi-flexed (20°) fluoroscopy-guided posteroanterior knee radiographs (Lyon Schuss view) were obtained. Medial knee JSWs, defined as the narrowest inter-bone distance, were measured independently by two observers, one of which was an experienced observer and the other was a first time Image J user. Inter-observer variability (before and after one-hour training) and intra-observer variability, at short term (3 weeks) and long term (4 years) were calculated by using coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results:

One-hour training resulted in significant improvement in inter-observer variability (CV 6.6% vs 4.4%; ICC 0.89 vs0.98). Intraobserver variability at short term (3 weeks) was similar to long term (4 years) for the experienced observer (CV 3.8% vs 3.5%; ICC 0.97 vs 0.98). After one-hour training, intra-observer variability was also low for the first time Image J user (CV 3.8%; ICC 0.98).

Conclusion:

Radiographic quantification of the JSW of the knee in patients with OA using Image J is reproducible. ImageJ, which is an open access and free software, is convenient to apply and requires only brief training to obtain high reproducibility.

References

1Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:26-35.
2Turkiewicz A, Petersson IF, Bjork J, Hawker G, Dahlberg LE, Lohmander LS, et al. Current and future impact of osteoarthritis on health care: a population-based study with projections to year 2032. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:1826-32.
3Block JA. Osteoarthritis: OA guidelines: improving care or merely codifying practice? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014;10:324-6.
4Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet 2019;393:1745-59.
5Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, Javaid MK, Cooper C, Diez-Perez A, Arden NK. Incidence and risk factors for clinically diagnosed knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis: influences of age, gender and osteoarthritis affecting other joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1659-64.
6Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1545-602.
7Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29:1039-49.
8Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502.
9Vignon E, Piperno M, Le Graverand MP, Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Mathieu P, et al. Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:378-84.
10Goker B, Block JA. Improved precision in quantifying knee alignment angle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;458:145-9.
11Goker B, Gonen E, Demirag MD, Block JA. Quantification of the radiographic joint space width of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2083-9.
12Oo WM, Hunter DJ. Disease modification in osteoarthritis: are we there yet? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019;37 Suppl 120:135-40.
13Oo WM, Yu SP, Daniel MS, Hunter DJ. Disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis: current understanding and future therapeutics. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2018;23:331-47.
14ADMINISTRATION FAD. Clinical Development Programs for Drugs, Devices, and Biological Products Intended for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-1999-07-15/99-18031/context 1999
15AGENCY EM. Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. http://www.ema.eurepa.eu/ema/index 2010.
16Bedson J, Croft PR. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:116.
17Hunter DJ, Zhang W, Conaghan PG, Menashe L, Li L, Reichmann WM, Losina E, et al. Systematic review of the concurrent and predictive validity of MRI biomarkers in OA. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:557-88.
18Felson D, Niu J, Sack B, Aliabadi P, McCullough C, Nevitt MC. Progression of osteoarthritis as a state of inertia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:924-9.
19Emrani PS, Katz JN, Kessler CL, Reichmann M, Wright EA, McAlindon TE, et al. Joint space narrowing and Kellgren-Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: an analytic literature synthesis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:873-82.
20Reichmann WM, Maillefert JF, Hunter DJ, Katz JN, Conaghan PG, Losina E. Responsiveness to change and reliability of measurement of radiographic joint space width in osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:550-6.
21Duryea J, Li J, Peterfy CG, Gordon C, Genant HK. Trainable rule-based algorithm for the measurement of joint space width in digital radiographic images of the knee. Med Phys 2000;27:580-91.
22Sugiyama S, Itokazu M, Suzuki Y, Shimizu K. Procollagen II C propeptide level in the synovial fluid as a predictor of radiographic progression in early knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:27-32.
23Kahan A, Uebelhart D, De Vathaire F, Delmas PD, Reginster JY. Long-term effects of chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate on knee osteoarthritis: the study on osteoarthritis progression prevention, a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:524-33.
24Komatsu D, Hasegawa Y, Kojima T, Seki T, Ikeuchi K, Takegami Y, et al. Validity of radiographic assessment of the knee joint space using automatic image analysis. Mod Rheumatol 2016;26:761-6.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House